The 2018 Media Quality Rating (MQR) is more important than the first one. It now shows which titles have gotten better or worse since 2016. This should please or annoy the editorial teams and publishers concerned and perhaps give them something to think about when comparing them to other industries. Scientific studies on media taiwan rcs data quality, such as the Yearbook Quality in Journalism or the Tamedia Quality Report, can lead to editors and journalists rethinking their own work and perhaps even improving it.
"The golden Q looks good on the office desk, but it does not lead to additional income"
Moreover, what do such quality investigations bring to the titles concerned? Apart from a brief moment of respect from colleagues and the publisher's own readers (assuming they even hear about them) - little, and above all nothing existential.
This also applies to the MQR 2018. The edition presented in Zurich on Monday attracted a lot of attention . Around 30 guests - including representatives of the top media titles - came to the Hotel Schweizerhof to have the results explained to them by the Media Quality Foundation Association ( persoenlich.com reported ).