When developing mutual trust, it is not worth bringing it to conflict. It is important to remember that you can use not only the abilities of opponents, but also their shortcomings, connecting people.
Non-discrimination method
Its essence lies in eliminating any differences between 3 phone number identifier philippines partners. There is no need to emphasize the superiority of one of the parties. An excellent option is material incentives. With its help, you can equalize employees of the organization with different competencies. This method is often used by corporations in Japan.
From an objective point of view, the equalization method cannot be called fair. After all, it excludes individual incentives. However, when it comes to the need to resolve a conflict, eliminating unnecessary emotions will be beneficial.
For example, when employees receive the same bonus, they will no longer feel resentment and envy, which can be one of the key reasons for the incident.
Many companies, wishing to achieve maximum non-conflict in the team, prefer to distribute rewards among all its members. And it does not matter that only one employee could have made the overwhelming contribution to achieving success.
This method of conflict resolution is often used in everyday life. For example, when going hunting or fishing in a group, you can divide the catch into equal parts. In Japan, there is a saying that has been preserved since ancient times: "If you do the job better than others, you should not act like a winner."
Download a useful document on the topic:
Checklist: How to Achieve Your Goals in Negotiations with Clients
Frequently asked questions about conflict resolution methods
Conflicts can be beneficial for a company. The existence of a dispute indicates that there are certain problems in the organization of work processes and communication between employees.
What principle should be followed?
Define the problem based on the opponent's personal attitude to the situation, trying to put yourself in his place. It is necessary to eliminate your own fears and show the other side that you are ready to resolve this conflict. The methods of solving the problem should be tough, and communication with opponents should be soft.
What to do if none of the methods worked?
Finding a solution to a conflict that would satisfy both parties, especially when it comes to personal relationships, is not always possible. In a situation where the manager was unable to resolve the dispute between employees, but tried to do so, you can think about transferring them.
A long-term conflict between colleagues can have a negative impact on the entire team. You can think about getting rid of such employees. After all, business is about achieving profit, not maintaining relationships between people.
When to resort to judicial resolution of a corporate conflict?
Negotiations are not always a guarantee that a dispute will not go to court. As a rule, this happens in a number of cases. Firstly, if the conflict continues despite peaceful attempts to resolve it. Secondly, if interim measures are required.
Thirdly, when one of the opponents wants to show the other his serious intentions, receiving additional leverage in negotiations.
By choosing the right method of conflict resolution, you can prevent disputes from having a destructive impact on your company's operatio