Nuziainen recommends exploring the real possibilities
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 3:31 am
Aiven CTO Heikki Noosiainen also believes that the threat of a shutdown from all major cloud providers at once is very low for most enterprises — but companies may want to retain the ability to move code around for disaster recovery purposes. “Although rare, we do occasionally see large outages of Google, AWS, or Azure in one or more regions,” he says. And companies with very downtime-sensitive online business needs may want to be able to restore from backups.
of multi-cloud operation, so that companies can freely choose providers without being locked in, and using open source technology, as this allows the same set of services to run across multiple clouds. Some of these options may not be cheap, but the overall benefits may be worth it. “It costs money, but if you invest in building an infrastructure-as-code solution, it will solve many other problems along the way, including disaster recovery,” Nuziainen said.
According to Valentine, the design of enterprise benin whatsapp data can play a major role in how a company handles a cloud outage. “Most have applications that were running on-premises and then moved to the cloud,” he says. “This migration strategy has some drawbacks.”
Moving the application again could be difficult, Valentine said, because some changes had already been made to migrate to the cloud as a primary environment. If the company takes the time to restructure the applications, perhaps using the Kubernetes container model, they will be more portable.
He notes that there can be other pitfalls to cloud migration, such as organizations becoming locked into a specific provider due to their choice of technology. To avoid this, he says, organizations can choose open source technology, which allows them to create a vendor-agnostic platform that can be supported by multiple providers. “But it’s expensive. It takes twice as long, so it costs twice as much, so is it worth it?” asks Valentine.
of multi-cloud operation, so that companies can freely choose providers without being locked in, and using open source technology, as this allows the same set of services to run across multiple clouds. Some of these options may not be cheap, but the overall benefits may be worth it. “It costs money, but if you invest in building an infrastructure-as-code solution, it will solve many other problems along the way, including disaster recovery,” Nuziainen said.
According to Valentine, the design of enterprise benin whatsapp data can play a major role in how a company handles a cloud outage. “Most have applications that were running on-premises and then moved to the cloud,” he says. “This migration strategy has some drawbacks.”
Moving the application again could be difficult, Valentine said, because some changes had already been made to migrate to the cloud as a primary environment. If the company takes the time to restructure the applications, perhaps using the Kubernetes container model, they will be more portable.
He notes that there can be other pitfalls to cloud migration, such as organizations becoming locked into a specific provider due to their choice of technology. To avoid this, he says, organizations can choose open source technology, which allows them to create a vendor-agnostic platform that can be supported by multiple providers. “But it’s expensive. It takes twice as long, so it costs twice as much, so is it worth it?” asks Valentine.