For example, one participant described a news story shared
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:40 am
Creators in select markets can now publish video podcasts to Spotify DATA, AUTOMATION, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE What limits should be placed on AI to protect fundamental rights? “The algorithm is an influencer like any other” Why it's so hard to make AI fair and unbiased Twitter lures developers with app platform Zuckerberg says Meta will more actively use AI to compete with TikTok Baseten Raises $20 Million to Make Machine Learning-Based Apps Easier to Build 80% of consumers will talk to a bot if they can connect live to a human BLOCKCHAIN, CRYPTO, NFT, METAVERS, Web3 NFT: The Two Faces of Crypto-Art Collectors Ready for a Big Mac in the Metaverse? NFTs and the Nostalgia of Childhood Brand Marketing Money, the primary motivation for purchasing NFTs Will, “the first homeless avatar of the metaverse”, raises awareness of precariousness Cryptoasset disputes are increasing at the Financial Markets Authority €2.
With her that consisted of a screenshot of an Instagram shareholder database post of a newspaper article, which she ultimately deemed trustworthy because of the newspaper's reputation, whereas "if these are messages that have been typed by someone, then I don't trust them." Many users fear scams via WhatsApp and are therefore reluctant to click on links that take them outside the platform, and most respondents have received false information via WhatsApp in the past. Many also struggled to identify the origin of news shared with them on WhatsApp, leading them to adopt a more skeptical approach to information in general, on or off the platform.
“On WhatsApp, not everyone is concerned about verifying information. So sometimes you get a lot of information from people who just read the headline of a news story and didn’t check it.” – Cristiana Google Unlike Facebook and WhatsApp, Google contains fewer explicit signals about what people think about the information they encounter there. In contrast, other features of the platform were particularly highlighted when users described how they consumed information there. Participants often referred to Google 's ranking of content as an important indicator of quality, typically preferring the top results over the others.
With her that consisted of a screenshot of an Instagram shareholder database post of a newspaper article, which she ultimately deemed trustworthy because of the newspaper's reputation, whereas "if these are messages that have been typed by someone, then I don't trust them." Many users fear scams via WhatsApp and are therefore reluctant to click on links that take them outside the platform, and most respondents have received false information via WhatsApp in the past. Many also struggled to identify the origin of news shared with them on WhatsApp, leading them to adopt a more skeptical approach to information in general, on or off the platform.
“On WhatsApp, not everyone is concerned about verifying information. So sometimes you get a lot of information from people who just read the headline of a news story and didn’t check it.” – Cristiana Google Unlike Facebook and WhatsApp, Google contains fewer explicit signals about what people think about the information they encounter there. In contrast, other features of the platform were particularly highlighted when users described how they consumed information there. Participants often referred to Google 's ranking of content as an important indicator of quality, typically preferring the top results over the others.