Page 1 of 1

Google Contrary to the idea that anyone can link to yo

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2024 10:39 am
by Samiul7921
We know they have the ability to effectively “turn off” a site’s ability to pass PageRank to another, and they now have the ability to interpret the use of the nofollow tag so that they can decide whether or not it can be used for indexing and ranking purposes. With this in mind, it makes sense for Google to evaluate the site providing the link and use this as a strong indicator to help decide how much value to pass through the link. Even if there is no topical relevance, they are still able to pass value, but they trust the site providing the link – which, as we have seen, can easily happen.

The content we create sends a stronger signal to u, you have greater control over the belize phone number database content you create. Even if your site contains a lot of user-generated content, you still have overall editorial control over the process of publishing that content. Essentially, you can be held accountable for the content you create. If you run an online pet store and create a piece of content about personal finance, few people would argue that it is inconsequential.

But the key difference compared to getting a random link from a personal finance site is that you are responsible for the content because it is on a site you operate. Therefore, Google can hold you to a higher standard. So even if that content gets 100 links, it’s easy for Google to say they don’t hold those links in high regard because they don’t see any topical relevance. Does Google Really Want to Reward Irrelevant Content Campaigns This is key for me, let’s bring this all back to link building.