This is the solution advocated by GEORGE GURVITCH

[mahbubamim077]

It is therefore legitimate, if not advisable, that when specifically characterizing, using its own criteria, what constitutes profits for the purposes of participation, ordinary law adopts appropriate precautions, with the aim of preventing the economic weakening of companies or discouraging new activities.

And among the reserves that should be deducted from profits should be included those related to the guarantee of adequate remuneration of capital for the conservation or integrity of the latter, the replacement buy bulk sms indonesia of facilities, taking into account currency devaluation rates, in addition to other reserves of the same nature, which should be excluded from the profits to be distributed, for the economic security of the company.

Furthermore, it is necessary to reduce the sources of friction between employers and workers. It would be dangerous to turn workers into spies or inspectors for companies with regard to income tax. Profit sharing is intended to create harmony; if it becomes a source of friction, it will have a counterproductive effect. Hence the convenience of avoiding confusion between the two problems. In characterizing profits, the first share to be separated should be the reasonable remuneration of capital, to compensate for the risks of the enterprise.

In addition to this quota of remuneration of capital, the legislator is free to establish any other quotas intended to serve as a basis for the normal survival of the company and its economic expansion. These quotas may be excluded from the profits to be shared among the workers, because, we insist, the Constitution did not define, nor could it do so, what profits are for the purpose of this sharing.